Hazan Success: Defends opposition in Trade Mark Battle

Davley Building Pty Ltd v Granny Flats Australia Pty Ltd [2016] ATMO 92 (27 October 2016)

Re: Oppositions by Davley Building Pty Ltd to registration of trade mark application nos. 1551414 (37) and 1551417 (42) – GRANNY FLATS AUSTRALIA and Device – in the name of Granny Flats Australia Pty Ltd.


In favour of the Applicant Granny Glats Australia Pty Ltd, represented by Peter Whitehead of Hazan Hollander Lawyers: Opposition to registrations under section 52 of the Trade Marks Act 1995sections 58, 60 and 42(b) considered – no grounds established – Trade Marks to proceed to registration.


  1. This matter concerns oppositions under the Trade Marks Act 1995 (‘the Act’) to the registration of the following trade marks (‘the Trade Marks’) filed in the name of Granny Flats Australia Pty Ltd (‘the Applicant’):

TM No.


Priority Date


Specification of Services

Class 37: Building and construction services; Development of property (building and construction services); Housing development (building and construction services); Property development (building and construction services); Maintenance and repair of buildings; Installation of fittings for buildings; Development of land (construction)

Class 42: Advisory services relating to building design; Building design services; Civil engineering (design); Design of building interiors; Design of buildings; Design planning; Design services; Design services for architecture; Designing and planning of real estate subdivisions and developments; Advisory services relating to architecture; Architecture;

  1. The Trade Marks were examined as required under section 31 of the Act and advertised as accepted for possible registration in the Australian Official Journal of Trade Marks on 1 August 2013. A Notice of Intention to Oppose followed by a Statement of Grounds and Particulars (‘the SGP’) was filed by Davley Building Pty Ltd trading as GrannyFlatsWA.com (‘the Opponent’).

The SGP particularised the grounds of opposition under sections 60, 42(b) and 58 of the Act. A Notice of Intention to Defend was subsequently filed by the Applicant, followed by the evidence stages of the oppositions.

Latest blog posts

Resisting attempts to revoke acceptance of Crazy Buffalo trade mark

Globalscope Pty Ltd (‘the Applicant’)…

Cases June 8, 2021

Landmark Trade Mark Win Against Budweiser

This trade mark case primarily concerns the markings on bottles…

Cases December 14, 2020

Trade Mark Dispute: Wicked Sister v Wicked

PDP used the trade mark WICKED SISTER in plain word and stylised forms…

Cases September 10, 2020