fbpx

Trademark Infringement Defence

The Federal Court has handed down its decision in Boyd v Wild Hibiscus Flower Company Pty Limited.

In this case, allegations of trade mark infringement, misleading and deceptive conduct and passing off were made against the Respondent with an application to the Federal Court of Australia for urgent injunctions to stop the Respondent from selling its products under this trade mark and get up.

Hazan Hollander was successful in defending that application and obtained a costs order. The Applicants have since discontinued the proceedings with costs. A copy of the judgment is available here. For more information please contact Hazan Hollander.

Latest blog posts

Recent Changes to the Designs Act 2003

The Designs Act 2003 is a piece of Commonwealth legislation that guides designers in registering and protecting their registered designs. For example, the…

InsightsLegislation August 16, 2022

Defending Doctors Against Allegations

Doctors are often unfairly targeted by unqualified health practitioners, dissatisfied patients, and medical facilities that want to protect their own…

Insights July 28, 2022

Resolving Shareholder Disputes

Owning and running a company is no easy task, which makes it all the more important to ensure that all company shareholders are on the same page with…

Insights March 8, 2022